NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 8 month(s) later
6.5x more core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 200 MHz
Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz
5.7x more texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
18.2x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 22 nm
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3285
Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3285
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5923 vs 2095
2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5923 vs 2095

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 February 2017 vs 27 May 2013
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1300 MHz
Texture fill rate	59.2 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	640 vs 40
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 22 nm
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5923 vs 2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5923 vs 2095

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Around 57% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 47 Watt

Thermal Design Power (TDP)	30 Watt vs 47 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3285

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5923

2095

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5923

2095

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3285
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5923	2095
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5923	2095
PassMark - G3D Mark		1191
PassMark - G2D Mark		399
Geekbench - OpenCL		5081

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile	Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Generation 7.5
Code name	GP107	Haswell GT3e
Launch date	7 February 2017	27 May 2013
Place in performance rating	532	644
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1300 MHz
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	200 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	104.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	22 nm
Pipelines	640	40
Texture fill rate	59.2 GTexel / s	10.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	47 Watt	30 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	392 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Laptop size		medium sized
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	eDRAM
Shared memory		1
Technologies
Quick Sync