NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
Around 41% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 924 MHz
Around 44% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1038 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
Around 72% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 81 Watt
2.4x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2500 MHz

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 February 2017 vs 7 October 2014
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 924 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	47 Watt vs 81 Watt
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 2500 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717 vs 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3342

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 83.04 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 1280 vs 640
Around 40% better floating-point performance: 2,657 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8546 vs 5923
Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8546 vs 5923

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	83.04 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1280 vs 640
Floating-point performance	2,657 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8546 vs 5923
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8546 vs 5923

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3699

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3342

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5923

8546

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5923

8546

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	5923	8546
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	5923	8546
PassMark - G3D Mark		5691
PassMark - G2D Mark		378
Geekbench - OpenCL		19001
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		59.428
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1113.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		4.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		39.101
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		81.909
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		472

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GP107	GM204
Launch date	7 February 2017	7 October 2014
Place in performance rating	525	568
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Launch price (MSRP)		$2,560.89
Price now		$1,899
Value for money (0-100)		3.99
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1038 MHz
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	924 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	2,657 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	640	1280
Texture fill rate	59.2 GTexel / s	83.04 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	47 Watt	81 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	5,200 million
CUDA cores		1280
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support		1
G-SYNC support
HDMI
VGA аnalog display support		1
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Laptop size		large
SLI options		1
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL		1.1
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	120 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	2500 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Ansel
BatteryBoost
CUDA
DSR
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus
SLI