NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GRID K280Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GRID K280Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 70% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 745 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.8x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 57% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4456 vs 2840
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 371
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 6555
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 1312
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 6555
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 1312
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 28 June 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4456 vs 2840 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 371 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 6555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 vs 1312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 6555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 vs 1312 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K280Q
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 1536 vs 512
- Around 21% better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3562 vs 3348
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3562 vs 3348
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 512 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 1,894 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3562 vs 3348 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3562 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K280Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GRID K280Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4456 | 2840 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 | 371 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 6555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 1312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3562 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 6555 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 1312 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3562 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GRID K280Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 28 June 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | $1,875 |
Place in performance rating | 521 | 539 |
Price now | $319.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |