NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 823 MHz
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 59.2 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 512 vs 384
- Around 50% better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 170 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6796 vs 3362
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6796 vs 3362
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 8 March 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 823 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s vs 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops vs 1,263.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt vs 170 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 vs 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 vs 3362 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6895 vs 3702
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6895 vs 3702
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6895 vs 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6895 vs 3702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3348 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15667 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 71.86 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 832.248 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.081 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3352 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | 3362 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 6895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3352 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | GF114 |
| Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 8 March 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
| Place in performance rating | 517 | 470 |
| Price now | $319.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1266 MHz | 823 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | 1,263.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | 52.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 47 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 1,950 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | 229 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB / s | 128.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P1000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370M
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIATesla K40c
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850A
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960
