NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P1000 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
2.1x more core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 600 MHz
2x more pipelines: 512 vs 2x 128
2.5x better floating-point performance: 1,894 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
4.8x lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 226 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
3.1x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
6.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4451 vs 676
Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 509

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	7 February 2017 vs 18 April 2008
Core clock speed	1266 MHz vs 600 MHz
Pipelines	512 vs 2x 128
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	47 Watt vs 226 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2x 1 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4451 vs 676
PassMark - G2D Mark	603 vs 509

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

4x more texture fill rate: 2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4196 vs 3348
Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4196 vs 3348

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 59.2 GTexel / s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	4196 vs 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	4196 vs 3348

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

4451

676

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

603

509

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3348

4196

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3348

4196

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P1000	NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
PassMark - G3D Mark	4451	676
PassMark - G2D Mark	603	509
Geekbench - OpenCL	15667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	71.86
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	65.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	245.081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3348	4196
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3348	4196
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1591

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P1000	NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla
Code name	GP107	G92
Launch date	7 February 2017	18 April 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	$2,999
Place in performance rating	523	467
Price now	$319.99
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	15.53
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz
Core clock speed	1266 MHz	600 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,894 gflops	2x 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Pipelines	512	2x 128
Texture fill rate	59.2 GTexel / s	2x 38.4 GTexel / s billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	47 Watt	226 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	754 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm	267 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2x 1 GB
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB / s	2x 51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	2x 256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3