NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 5.2x more core clock speed: 1557 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- Around 72% higher texture fill rate: 94.72 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s
- 21.3x more pipelines: 1024 vs 48
- 3.4x better floating-point performance: 3,031 gflops vs 883.2 gflops
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8429 vs 2475
- 3.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8429 vs 2475
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1825 vs 958
- Around 91% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1825 vs 958
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s vs 55.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 48 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops vs 883.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 vs 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 vs 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 vs 958 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2304 vs 1680
- Around 37% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2304 vs 1680
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2304 vs 1680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2304 vs 1680 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8429 | 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8429 | 2475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1825 | 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1825 | 958 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1680 | 2304 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1680 | 2304 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1461 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 569 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4466 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Broadwell GT3e |
| Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 695 | 789 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1607 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1557 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 3,031 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 94.72 GTexel / s | 55.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 140.2 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon X700
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6150
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6100 + nForce 430
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 140 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro 7000
NVIDIAQuadro P2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5000
