NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 466.8x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 255.8 GTexel / s
• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 180 Watt
• Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 876
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1958.592 vs 1797.792
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.742 vs 26.444
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3638
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3638

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

• Around 61% higher core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz
• Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1493 MHz
• Around 90% higher pipelines: 2432 vs 1280
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
• Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14685 vs 9322
• Around 64% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 51434 vs 31445
• Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 182.11 vs 121.124
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 14.071 vs 8.452
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1035.984 vs 510.941
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16128 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 1676
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16128 vs 11437
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 1676
• 2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6809 vs 3404

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9322 14685
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	921 876
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	31445 51434
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	121.124 182.11
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1958.592 1797.792
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.452 14.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	120.742 26.444
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	510.941 1035.984
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11437 16128
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3717 3638
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1676 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3404 6809

Compare specifications (specs)