NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 869x more texture fill rate: 119.4 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 920 vs 525
- 16.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1676 vs 103
- 16.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1676 vs 103
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 June 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 vs 525 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 vs 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 vs 103 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1227 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1647 MHz vs 1493 MHz
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10579 vs 9321
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34875 vs 31469
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 11437
- Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 11437
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1227 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 5 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10579 vs 9321 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 34875 vs 31469 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 vs 11437 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 vs 11437 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9321 | 10579 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 920 | 525 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 31469 | 34875 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11437 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1676 | 103 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11437 | 16345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1676 | 103 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3404 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP106 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 10 June 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 304 | 285 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1647 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1000 MHz | 1227 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 119.4 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 59.72 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.822 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 59.72 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 119.4 GTexel/s | 137.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4400 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Length | 201 mm (7.9") | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 200.2 GB/s | 192.3 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 160 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5 |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P2200 with others
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M465X
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX570A
NVIDIAQuadro P2200 vs
AMDRadeon Pro W6600X
