NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P2200

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200

Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 945 MHz
Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 922 vs 523

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1000 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	922 vs 523

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
Around 80% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1280
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Around 20% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 5 GB
Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11183 vs 9336
2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64495 vs 31445
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 11437
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 1676
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 11437
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 1676

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
Pipelines	2304 vs 1280
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 5 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11183 vs 9336
Geekbench - OpenCL	64495 vs 31445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 11437
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 1676
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 11437
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 1676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

9336

11183

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

922

523

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

31445

64495

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

14496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1676

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

11437

14496

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3717

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1676

3361

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P2200	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
PassMark - G3D Mark	9336	11183
PassMark - G2D Mark	922	523
Geekbench - OpenCL	31445	64495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	121.124
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1958.592
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	8.452
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	120.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	510.941
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	11437	14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3717	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1676	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	11437	14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3717	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1676	3361
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3404

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P2200	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Code name	GP106	N19E-Q1
Launch date	10 June 2019	27 May 2019
Place in performance rating	304	231
Type	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1380 MHz
Core clock speed	1000 MHz	945 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	119.4 GFLOPS	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	59.72 GFLOPS	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.822 TFLOPS	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1280	2304
Pixel fill rate	59.72 GPixel/s	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	119.4 GTexel/s	198.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	80 Watt
Transistor count	4400 million	10800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	201 mm (7.9")
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
Laptop size		Large
API support
DirectX	12.0	12.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	5 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	200.2 GB/s	448 GB/s
Memory bus width	160 bit	192 Bit
Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Memory clock speed		14000 MHz
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready