NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 380X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 380X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher boost clock speed: 1476 MHz vs 970 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 190 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 7.2x more memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 970 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8920 vs 6224
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12948 vs 9685
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12948 vs 9685
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 19 November 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1476 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 190 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 970 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8920 vs 6224 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12948 vs 9685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12948 vs 9685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 380X
- Around 28% higher texture fill rate: 124.2 GTexel / s vs 96.8 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- Around 28% better floating-point performance: 3,973 gflops vs 3,098 gflops
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 667 vs 457
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.2 GTexel / s vs 96.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,973 gflops vs 3,098 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 667 vs 457 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 380X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8920 | 6224 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | 667 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 32521 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12948 | 9685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12948 | 9685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3361 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 3053 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile | AMD Radeon R9 380X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | GP104 | Antigua |
| Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 19 November 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 334 | 313 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
| Price now | $528.44 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.61 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1476 MHz | 970 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1328 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 3,098 gflops | 3,973 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 96.8 GTexel / s | 124.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 190 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,000 million |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
| Length | 221 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2 x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 168.3 GB / s | 182.4 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz | 970 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
AMDFirePro W9000
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 2048SP
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Mobile vs
NVIDIACMP 30HX
