NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs Intel Iris Graphics 550
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and Intel Iris Graphics 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 4.1x more core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 5.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 48
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1638 vs 1432
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 442 vs 305
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2709 vs 2675
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 1290
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 3157
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2709 vs 2675
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 1290
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 3157
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 1 September 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Pipelines | 256 vs 48 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1638 vs 1432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 vs 305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 vs 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 vs 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 vs 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 vs 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 vs 3157 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Graphics 550
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7182 vs 3053
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7182 vs 3053 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: Intel Iris Graphics 550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | Intel Iris Graphics 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1638 | 1432 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 | 305 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | 7182 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 318.72 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.858 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | 3157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | 2675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | 1290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | 3157 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 | Intel Iris Graphics 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Generation 9.0 |
Code name | GP107 | Skylake GT3e |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 1 September 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 992 | 953 |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 48 |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |