NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4000 and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1202 MHz vs 1188 MHz
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1243 MHz
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 9% higher memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 7000 MHz
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11654 vs 7885
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 827 vs 812
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 vs 38420
- Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 152.325 vs 115.834
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 11.365 vs 10.152
- Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 751.626 vs 597.677
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 10320
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3575
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 10320
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3575
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 vs 10 November 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz vs 1188 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1243 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 130 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 7000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11654 vs 7885 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 vs 812 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 vs 38420 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 vs 115.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 vs 10.152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 vs 597.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 vs 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 vs 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
- Around 8% higher texture fill rate: 179.0 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- Around 8% better floating-point performance: 5,728 gflops vs 5,304 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1987.633 vs 1590.392
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 105.263 vs 45.977
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 179.0 GTexel / s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 5,728 gflops vs 5,304 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1987.633 vs 1590.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 105.263 vs 45.977 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11654 | 7885 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 827 | 812 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 42289 | 38420 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | 115.834 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | 1987.633 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | 10.152 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | 105.263 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | 597.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | 10320 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3347 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4904 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 6 February 2017 | 10 November 2016 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | $799 |
Place in performance rating | 275 | 310 |
Price now | $799.99 | $539.99 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | 19.25 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | 1243 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | 1188 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | 5,728 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2304 |
Texture fill rate | 165.8 GTexel / s | 179.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 130 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,700 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 224.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
HDMI 2.0 |