NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1227 MHz vs 861 MHz
- Around 59% higher boost clock speed: 1647 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 137.4 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 4,398 gflops vs 4,252 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10579 vs 7915
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 11804
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3684
- Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 11804
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3684
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 8 April 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1227 MHz vs 861 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 137.4 GTexel / s vs 132.9 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops vs 4,252 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10579 vs 7915 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 vs 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 vs 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3684 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7012 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 698 vs 525
- 40.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4193 vs 103
- 40.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4193 vs 103
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
Memory clock speed | 7012 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 698 vs 525 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4193 vs 103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4193 vs 103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10579 | 7915 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 | 698 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 | 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 103 | 4193 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 | 11804 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3684 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 103 | 4193 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP104 | GM204 |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 8 April 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 285 | 241 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1227 MHz | 861 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | 4,252 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 137.4 GTexel / s | 132.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 224.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 7012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |