NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs AMD Radeon 520
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and AMD Radeon 520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 27% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 45% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 20.60 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 384 vs 320
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 243 vs 206
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2105 vs 859
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 1182
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 1182
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 1242
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 1242
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 18 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s vs 20.60 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 320 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 4500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 243 vs 206 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2105 vs 859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 vs 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 vs 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 vs 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 vs 1242 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 520
- 36x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 1800 million
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 26304 vs 7391
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 2295
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 2295
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 1800 million |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 26304 vs 7391 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 2295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 2295 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 520
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | AMD Radeon 520 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 243 | 206 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2105 | 859 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7391 | 26304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 | 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 | 1182 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 | 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 | 1242 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2295 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2295 | 3351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P520 | AMD Radeon 520 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP108 | Oland |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 766 | 1098 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop, Laptop |
Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 1st Gen | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 23.89 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.94 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 764.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.89 GPixel/s | 4.10 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s | 20.60 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 1800 million | 50 Watt |
Compute units | 5 | |
Floating-point performance | 660 GFLOPs | |
Render output units | 4 | |
Stream Processors | 320 | |
Texture Units | 20 | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
DualGraphics | ||
Enduro | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |