NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro P520

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 8 month(s) later
4.3x more core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1200 MHz
8x more pipelines: 384 vs 48
Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2105 vs 1739
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 2780
Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 2780
Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3566 vs 1884
Around 89% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3566 vs 1884

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 1 September 2017
Core clock speed	1303 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Pipelines	384 vs 48
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	2105 vs 1739
Geekbench - OpenCL	7356 vs 7346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527 vs 2780
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527 vs 2780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566 vs 1884
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566 vs 1884

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

120x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 1800 million
Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 vs 243
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3343 vs 2295
Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3343 vs 2295

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 1800 million
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	363 vs 243
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3343 vs 2295
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3343 vs 2295

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

243

363

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

2105

1739

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7356

7346

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

2780

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3527

2780

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

1884

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3566

1884

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3343

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2295

3343

Name	NVIDIA Quadro P520	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
PassMark - G2D Mark	243	363
PassMark - G3D Mark	2105	1739
Geekbench - OpenCL	7356	7346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3527	2780
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3527	2780
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3566	1884
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3566	1884
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	2295	3343
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	2295	3343
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		37.109
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		465.116
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		2.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		29.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		54.932
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		619

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro P520	Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Generation 9.5
Code name	GP108	Coffee Lake GT3e
Launch date	27 May 2019	1 September 2017
Place in performance rating	765	1042
Type	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz	1200 MHz
Core clock speed	1303 MHz	300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	23.89 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	11.94 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	764.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	384	48
Pixel fill rate	23.89 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.89 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	1800 million	15 Watt
Transistor count		189 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Height	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Supplementary power connectors	None
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x1
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	40.10 GB/s
Memory bus width	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3 / DDR4
Technologies
Multi Monitor