NVIDIA Quadro P520 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P520 and NVIDIA GeForce 940MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P520
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 37% higher core clock speed: 1303 MHz vs 954 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 993 MHz
- 1002.5x more texture fill rate: 23.89 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 242 vs 171
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2100 vs 1514
- Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7356 vs 6158
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3527 vs 2486
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3527 vs 2486
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 28 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz vs 954 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 993 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s vs 23.83 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 vs 171 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2100 vs 1514 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 vs 6158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 vs 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 vs 2486 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
- 78.3x lower typical power consumption: 23 Watt vs 1800 million
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3587 vs 3566
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3587 vs 3566
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2295
- Around 46% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2295
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 23 Watt vs 1800 million |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3587 vs 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3587 vs 3566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2295 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2295 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | 171 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2100 | 1514 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7356 | 6158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3527 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3527 | 2486 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3566 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3566 | 3587 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2295 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2295 | 3357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 28.91 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 312.94 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.83 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 27.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 103.937 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 585 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P520 | NVIDIA GeForce 940MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell |
Code name | GP108 | GM108 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 28 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 765 | 1098 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 993 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1303 MHz | 954 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 23.89 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.94 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 764.4 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 23.89 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 23.89 GTexel/s | 23.83 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 1800 million | 23 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Height | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 40.10 GB/s | 40.1 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |