NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 601.5x more texture fill rate: 251.0 GTexel/s vs 417.3 GTexel / s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 8 August 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 251.0 GTexel/s vs 417.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1316 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1630 MHz vs 1569 MHz
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 1890 MHz vs 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective)
- 4.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 196748 vs 46449
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1316 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1630 MHz vs 1569 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz vs 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 196748 vs 46449 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega XT
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega XT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 46449 | 196748 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 8 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 465 | 34 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | 1630 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 251.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 125.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.033 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 100.4 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 251.0 GTexel/s | 417.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | |
Floating-point performance | 13,353 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 230.9 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective) | 1890 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin |