NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs AMD Radeon R9 280
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and AMD Radeon R9 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 933 MHz
- 2673.7x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 104.5 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 7957
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 7957
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3698
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3698
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3337
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3337
- 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6252 vs 2009
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 4 March 2014 |
Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz vs 933 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s vs 104.5 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1792 |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 vs 7957 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 vs 7957 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 vs 2009 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 43201 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 | 7957 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 | 7957 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 | 2009 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5567 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 665 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.829 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1266.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.909 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 365.384 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | AMD Radeon R9 280 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 4 March 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 289 | 422 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | 933 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 279.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 139.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.940 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 111.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s | 104.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 4,313 million |
Floating-point performance | 3,344 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | Large | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 230.4 GB/s | 240 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |