NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and AMD Radeon R9 280 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
  • Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 933 MHz
  • 2673.7x more texture fill rate: 279.4 GTexel/s vs 104.5 GTexel / s
  • Around 43% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1792
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 200 Watt
  • 5.3x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 3 GB
  • Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15910 vs 7957
  • 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15910 vs 7957
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 3698
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 3698
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3337
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3337
  • 3.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6252 vs 2009
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 21 February 2018 vs 4 March 2014
Boost clock speed 1569 MHz vs 933 MHz
Texture fill rate 279.4 GTexel/s vs 104.5 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2560 vs 1792
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 200 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 3 GB
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) vs 1250 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15910 vs 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15910 vs 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6252 vs 2009

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15910
7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
15910
7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
6252
2009
Name NVIDIA Quadro P5200 AMD Radeon R9 280
Geekbench - OpenCL 43201
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 15910 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 15910 7957
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3337
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 6252 2009
PassMark - G3D Mark 5567
PassMark - G2D Mark 665
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 67.829
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1266.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 6.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 79.909
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 365.384

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro P5200 AMD Radeon R9 280

Essentials

Architecture Pascal GCN 1.0
Code name GP104 Tahiti
Launch date 21 February 2018 4 March 2014
Place in performance rating 289 422
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon R9 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP) $279

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1569 MHz 933 MHz
Core clock speed 1316 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 279.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 139.7 GFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.940 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 1792
Pixel fill rate 111.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 279.4 GTexel/s 104.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt 200 Watt
Transistor count 7200 million 4,313 million
Floating-point performance 3,344 gflops
Stream Processors 1792

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size Large
Bus support PCIe 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 275 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 3 GB
Memory bandwidth 230.4 GB/s 240 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) 1250 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
LiquidVR
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)