NVIDIA Quadro P5200 vs Intel HD Graphics P4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 and Intel HD Graphics P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1316 MHz vs 650 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 22 nm
- 38.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41715 vs 1071
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 2225
- Around 67% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 2225
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2461
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2461
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 14 May 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1316 MHz vs 650 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 22 nm |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41715 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2461 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4000
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 100 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41715 | 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15910 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15910 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 2225 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2461 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2461 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6252 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 516 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 636 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 | Intel HD Graphics P4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Generation 7.0 |
Code name | GP104 | Ivy Bridge GT2 |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 14 May 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 291 | 615 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 650 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 22 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 279.4 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 139.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.940 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Pixel fill rate | 111.7 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 279.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 1,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | Large | |
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11.1 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 230.4 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz (7200 MHz effective) | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |