NVIDIA Quadro P620 vs ATI FireGL V8650

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P620 and ATI FireGL V8650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P620

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 8 month(s) later
• Around 84% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 688 MHz
• 4.2x more texture fill rate: 46.56 GTexel / s vs 11.01 GTexel / s
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 512 vs 320
• 3.4x better floating-point performance: 1,490 gflops vs 440.3 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
• 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1736 MHz
• 6.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3623 vs 550
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 vs 3357
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V8650

• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 vs 560

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V8650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3623 550
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	560 637
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6631 3357

Compare specifications (specs)