NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 390X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 947x more texture fill rate: 175.0 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 4.6x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 275 Watt
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 vs 114.288
- Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 vs 10.947
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 18 June 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s vs 184.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 275 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 vs 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 vs 10.947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Around 22% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2304
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9433 vs 8366
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 818 vs 343
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2911.861 vs 2046.214
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.411 vs 94.532
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 683.568 vs 645.647
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11675 vs 10140
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11675 vs 10140
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2816 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9433 vs 8366 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 818 vs 343 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2911.861 vs 2046.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.411 vs 94.532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 683.568 vs 645.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11675 vs 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11675 vs 10140 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 | 9433 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | 818 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | 114.288 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | 2911.861 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | 10.947 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | 118.411 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | 683.568 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 11675 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4242 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | TU106 | Grenada |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 18 June 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 325 | 279 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $429 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1050 MHz |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2816 |
Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s | 184.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 275 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 6,200 million |
Compute units | 44 | |
Floating-point performance | 5,914 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 2816 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Length | 275 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 512 bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Memory clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |