NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3706 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3290
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3706 vs 3652
• Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

• Around 68% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 600 MHz
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 8366
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 343
• 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 136722 vs 68305
• Around 82% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 220.867
• 3.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 2046.214
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 16.026
• 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 94.532
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 645.647
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 10140
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 10140

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8366 19370
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	343 869
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	68305 136722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	220.867 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2046.214 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	16.026 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	94.532 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	645.647 2101.927
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10140 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3706 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10140 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3706 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3351 3290

Compare specifications (specs)