NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon Pro SSG videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 517.4x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 4.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 350 Watt
- 7.4x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11163 vs 10972
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 11029
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 11029
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 8 August 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1890 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 vs 10972 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 11029 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 588 vs 522
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 vs 3719
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 vs 3719
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 6 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 588 vs 522 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 vs 3719 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 | 588 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 | 10972 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64529 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 170.923 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3178.443 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | Vega 10 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 231 | 158 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 12,500 million |
| Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
