NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 3356.4x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 3x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 6316
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 6316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
Core clock speed | 945 MHz vs 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 925 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 vs 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 64495
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3719
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3719
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3361
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3361
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 vs 64495 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3361 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11173 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64495 | 70535 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 6316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 8390 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 27566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 27566 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N19E-Q1 | Pitcairn |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 231 | 163 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 925 MHz |
Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 900 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 1024 |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 2,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | Large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |