NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon R9 390

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon R9 390 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

AMD Radeon R9 390

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1000 MHz
1241.9x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
3.4x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 275 Watt
14x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11163 vs 8936
Around 46% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64529 vs 44112
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14496 vs 10445
Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14496 vs 10445

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 18 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s vs 160.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt vs 275 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11163 vs 8936
Geekbench - OpenCL	64529 vs 44112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496 vs 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496 vs 10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3353

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 390

Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 522

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2560 vs 2304
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	800 vs 522

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 390

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

522

800

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

11163

8936

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

64529

44112

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

10445

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

14496

10445

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3708

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3719

3708

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3353

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3361

3353

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	AMD Radeon R9 390
PassMark - G2D Mark	522	800
PassMark - G3D Mark	11163	8936
Geekbench - OpenCL	64529	44112
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	14496	10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	14496	10445
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719	3708
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361	3353
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361	3353
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		120.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3164.164
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		11.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		116.473
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		607.381
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		3958

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000	AMD Radeon R9 390
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 2.0
Code name	N19E-Q1	Grenada
Launch date	27 May 2019	18 June 2015
Place in performance rating	231	297
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 300 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$329
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1000 MHz
Core clock speed	945 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2304	2560
Pixel fill rate	88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	198.7 GTexel/s	160.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	80 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	10800 million	6,200 million
Compute units		40
Floating-point performance		5,120 gflops
Stream Processors		2560
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	Large
Supplementary power connectors	None	1 x 6-pin, 1 x 8-pin
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		275 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	384 GB/s
Memory bus width	192 Bit	512 bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	1000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Technologies
Multi Monitor
VR Ready
AMD Eyefinity
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
HD3D
HDMI 4K Support
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TrueAudio
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
ZeroCore