NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs AMD Radeon R9 M470
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and AMD Radeon R9 M470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 945 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 38% higher boost clock speed: 1380 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 4139.6x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 6000 MHz
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 522 vs 307
- 4.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11163 vs 2331
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64495 vs 47924
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3719 vs 1804
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3719 vs 1804
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 vs 1674
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 vs 1674
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 15 May 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 48 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 6000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 vs 307 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 vs 2331 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64495 vs 47924 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 1674 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M470
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon R9 M470 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 | 307 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 | 2331 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64495 | 47924 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 1804 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 1674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 1674 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | AMD Radeon R9 M470 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | Strato |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 15 May 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 231 | 769 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,536 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | Large | large |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
