NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 175 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 17 October 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 175 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3350 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 824 vs 522
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16168 vs 11163
- Around 37% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88130 vs 64495
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22615 vs 14496
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22615 vs 14496
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 945 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 824 vs 522 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16168 vs 11163 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 88130 vs 64495 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22615 vs 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22615 vs 14496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 | 824 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11163 | 16168 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64495 | 88130 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 22615 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3350 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3350 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3729.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 154.621 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1303.435 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8875 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N19E-Q1 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 17 October 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 231 | 140 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
| Price now | $499.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 42.76 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 175 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10800 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | Large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 229 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
