NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 vs 523
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21790 vs 11189
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138643 vs 64319
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 14496
- Around 63% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 14496
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 945 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 vs 523 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21790 vs 11189 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138643 vs 64319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 14496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 14496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 | 935 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11189 | 21790 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64319 | 138643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14629 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | N19E-Q1 | TU102 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 229 | 87 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | Large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |