NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 429.2x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 8.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1696 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 March 2018 |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1696 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1132 MHz vs 945 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1628 MHz vs 1380 MHz
- 2.2x more pipelines: 5120 vs 2304
- 5.3x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 888 vs 523
- Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20021 vs 11189
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 160720 vs 64319
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19663 vs 14496
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19663 vs 14496
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1132 MHz vs 945 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1628 MHz vs 1380 MHz |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 888 vs 523 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20021 vs 11189 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 160720 vs 64319 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19663 vs 14496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19663 vs 14496 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 523 | 888 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11189 | 20021 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64319 | 160720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 19663 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3357 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 562.775 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 141.066 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1964.377 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA Quadro GV100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Code name | N19E-Q1 | GV100 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 March 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 229 | 94 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $8,999 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1628 MHz |
Core clock speed | 945 MHz | 1132 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 5120 |
Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 198.7 GTexel/s | 463.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10800 million | 21,100 million |
Floating-point performance | 14,817 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | Large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 32 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 870.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1696 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |