NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 503.3x more texture fill rate: 198.7 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
  • 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 55% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
  • Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64287 vs 60145
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 1 October 2016
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 9016 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 64287 vs 60145
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000

  • Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 945 MHz
  • Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1380 MHz
  • Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 691 vs 523
  • Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14912 vs 11191
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20035 vs 14496
  • Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20035 vs 14496
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1506 MHz vs 945 MHz
Boost clock speed 1645 MHz vs 1380 MHz
Pipelines 3840 vs 2304
Maximum memory size 24 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 691 vs 523
PassMark - G3D Mark 14912 vs 11191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 20035 vs 14496
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 20035 vs 14496

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
523
691
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
11191
14912
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
64287
60145
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
14496
20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3719
3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3361
3356
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 NVIDIA Quadro P6000
PassMark - G2D Mark 523 691
PassMark - G3D Mark 11191 14912
Geekbench - OpenCL 64287 60145
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 14496 20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 14496 20035
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3719 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3719 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3361 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3361 3356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 194.277
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1916.09
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 17.951
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 31.471
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 545.751
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 8770

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 NVIDIA Quadro P6000

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name N19E-Q1 GP102
Launch date 27 May 2019 1 October 2016
Place in performance rating 229 220
Type Mobile workstation Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $5,999
Price now $4,403.52
Value for money (0-100) 3.90

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 MHz 1645 MHz
Core clock speed 945 MHz 1506 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 198.7 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 12.72 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 6.359 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2304 3840
Pixel fill rate 88.32 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 198.7 GTexel/s 394.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 10800 million 11,800 million
Floating-point performance 12,634 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
G-SYNC support
Multi-display synchronization Quadro Sync II
Number of simultaneous displays 4

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size Large
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 8-pin
Length 267 mm
SLI options 1
Width 2" (5.1 cm)

API support

DirectX 12.1 12
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4 5.1
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 192 Bit 384 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 9016 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 384 Bit

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready
3D Vision Pro
ECC (Error Correcting Code)
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management