NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher core clock speed: 780 - 960 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 61% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 6316
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 6316
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 March 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 6316 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8390 vs 3716
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8390 vs 3716
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 27566 vs 3359
- 8.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 27566 vs 3359
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 70535 vs 68858
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8390 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8390 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 27566 vs 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 27566 vs 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 70535 vs 68858 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 6316 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 8390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 27566 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 27566 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 | 70535 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 181 | 165 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 1024 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 2,800 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 59.2 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
