NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1471 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 210 Watt
- 8.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 14462
- Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 14462
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 14 August 2017 |
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1471 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 210 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 14462 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
- Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1156 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- Around 37% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 774 vs 566
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13296 vs 12794
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 163998 vs 68858
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1156 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 774 vs 566 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13296 vs 12794 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 vs 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 163998 vs 68858 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 774 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 13296 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 14462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3361 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68858 | 163998 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 184.405 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1765.06 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.606 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 79.32 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1022.925 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6875 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 14 August 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 181 | 211 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX Vega Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1471 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 1156 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 210 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
Compute units | 56 | |
Floating-point performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.5 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 94.00 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 3584 | |
Texture fill rate | 330.00 GTexel/s | |
Texture Units | 256 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Memory bandwidth | 410 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |