NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 27% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 11008 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 15019
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 15019
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68580 vs 62308
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 10 March 2017 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 11008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68580 vs 62308 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Around 54% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 7% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- Around 38% higher maximum memory size: 11 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 566
- Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18558 vs 12794
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 11 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 566 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18558 vs 12794 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 937 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 18558 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68580 | 62308 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | GP102 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 181 | 200 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 352 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 11008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |