NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Around 82% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1408
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 17812
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 17812
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 67930 vs 62677
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1408 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 vs 12778 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67930 vs 62677 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 59% higher core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 810 vs 566
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 Oct 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 vs 566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 810 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 12778 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 17812 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67930 | 62677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 187.131 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2548.187 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 15.882 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 117.673 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 901.388 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5979 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | TU116 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 29 Oct 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 182 | 204 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1785 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1408 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 125 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 6600 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 157.1 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.05 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.027 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 9 inches (229 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |