NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 780 - 960 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 36% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 150 Watt
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 566 vs 538
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 vs 538 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Around 15% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2560
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13154 vs 12794
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19139 vs 18169
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19139 vs 18169
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3716
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 3359
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 3359
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 79991 vs 67930
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2944 vs 2560 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13154 vs 12794 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 vs 18169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 vs 18169 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79991 vs 67930 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 538 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 13154 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 19139 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 8905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 8060 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 8060 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67930 | 79991 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7990 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | TU104B |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 182 | 143 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1095 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2944 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |