NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Around 60% higher core clock speed: 780 - 960 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 566 vs 343
- Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12794 vs 8366
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 10140
- Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 10140
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 vs 343 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 vs 8366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 vs 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 vs 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3351 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 67930
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 vs 67930 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 343 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 8366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67930 | 68305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | TU106 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 May 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 182 | 325 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 600 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 10800 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 175.0 GTexel/s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
VR Ready |