NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q

  • Around 60% higher core clock speed: 780 - 960 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
  • Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
  • Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 566 vs 343
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12794 vs 8366
  • Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 18169 vs 10140
  • Around 79% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 18169 vs 10140
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 780 - 960 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1380 - 1485 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Pipelines 2560 vs 2304
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 6 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 566 vs 343
PassMark - G3D Mark 12794 vs 8366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 18169 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 18169 vs 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

  • Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 80 Watt
  • Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 vs 67930
Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 80 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 68305 vs 67930

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
566
343
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12794
8366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18169
10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18169
10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3351
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
67930
68305
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark 566 343
PassMark - G3D Mark 12794 8366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 18169 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 18169 10140
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 3706
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3351
Geekbench - OpenCL 67930 68305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 220.867
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 2046.214
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.026
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 94.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 645.647

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name N19E-Q3 MAX-Q TU106
Launch date 27 May 2019 27 May 2019
Place in performance rating 182 325
Type Mobile workstation Mobile workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1380 - 1485 MHz 1215 MHz
Core clock speed 780 - 960 MHz 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Pipelines 2560 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 60 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 10800 million
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 175.0 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 11.20 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 5.599 TFLOPS
Pixel fill rate 77.76 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 175.0 GTexel/s

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.1
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Vulkan
OpenCL 1.2
Shader Model 6.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s

Technologies

Multi Monitor
VR Ready