NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 200 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz
- Around 22% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 vs 566
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16042 vs 12794
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 18169
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 18169
- Around 53% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 68580
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 780 - 960 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1380 - 1485 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 vs 566 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16042 vs 12794 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 18169 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 18169 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 vs 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 vs 3716 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 vs 68580 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 566 | 749 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12794 | 16042 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18169 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18169 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3358 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 68580 | 105171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | N19E-Q3 MAX-Q | TU104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 181 | 154 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1380 - 1485 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 780 - 960 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
