NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and AMD FirePro W9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

AMD FirePro W9100

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1110 MHz vs 930 MHz
1524.7x more texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
6.8x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 750 Watt
Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12627 vs 7987
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 9143
2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 9143

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 26 March 2014
Core clock speed	1110 MHz vs 930 MHz
Texture fill rate	249.6 GTexel/s vs 163.7 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt vs 750 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	12627 vs 7987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19529 vs 9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19529 vs 9143

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W9100

Around 10% higher pipelines: 2816 vs 2560
2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 752 vs 551
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8219 vs 3715
2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8219 vs 3715
9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 32085 vs 3356
9.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 32085 vs 3356

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2816 vs 2560
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 8 GB
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	752 vs 551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8219 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8219 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	32085 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	32085 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W9100

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

551

752

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12627

7987

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19529

9143

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19529

9143

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

8219

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

8219

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

32085

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

32085

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile	AMD FirePro W9100
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7438
PassMark - G2D Mark	551	752
PassMark - G3D Mark	12627	7987
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19529	9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19529	9143
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	8219
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	8219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	32085
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	32085
Geekbench - OpenCL		43046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		106.585
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1878.403
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		9.751
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		82.208
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		511.115

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile	AMD FirePro W9100
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 2.0
Code name	TU104	Hawaii
Launch date	27 May 2019	26 March 2014
Place in performance rating	171	190
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	930 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	249.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.97 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	2816
Pixel fill rate	99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	249.6 GTexel/s	163.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt	750 Watt
Transistor count	13600 million	6,200 million
Floating-point performance		5,238 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Dual-link DVI support
HD сomponent video output
StereoOutput3D
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Form factor		Full Height / Full Length
Length		275 mm
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	320 GB / s
Memory bus width	256 bit	512 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5