NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

Around 11% higher texture fill rate: 249.6 GTexel/s vs 224.6 GTexel/s
Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
Around 36% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 150 Watt
Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 13621
Around 43% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 13621

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	249.6 GTexel/s vs 224.6 GTexel/s
Pipelines	2560 vs 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 6 GB
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19529 vs 13621
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19529 vs 13621

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
Around 2% higher core clock speed: 1130 MHz vs 1110 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
Around 4% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7709 vs 7438
Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 880 vs 551
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13685 vs 12627

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	21 Jan 2020 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed	1130 MHz vs 1110 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7709 vs 7438
PassMark - G2D Mark	880 vs 551
PassMark - G3D Mark	13685 vs 12627
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3719 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3719 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

7438

7709

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

551

880

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12627

13685

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19529

13621

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19529

13621

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3715

3719

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

3358

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	7438	7709
PassMark - G2D Mark	551	880
PassMark - G3D Mark	12627	13685
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19529	13621
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19529	13621
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3715	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3715	3719
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	3358
Geekbench - OpenCL		64851
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		207.909
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3560.776
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		20.486
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		148.938
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1111.648

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 1.0
Code name	TU104	Navi 10 XLE
Launch date	27 May 2019	21 Jan 2020
Place in performance rating	171	193
Type	Laptop	Desktop, Laptop
Launch price (MSRP)		$279
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1560 MHz
Core clock speed	1110 MHz	1130 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	249.6 GFLOPS (1:32)	449.3 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	15.97 TFLOPS (2:1)	14.38 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	7.987 TFLOPS	7.188 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	2304
Pixel fill rate	99.84 GPixel/s	99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	249.6 GTexel/s	224.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt	150 Watt
Transistor count	13600 million	10300 million
Compute units		36
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort count		3
DisplayPort support
HDMI
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
Width	IGP	Dual-slot
Length		10.5 inches (267 mm)
Recommended system power (PSU)		350 Watt
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	192 bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)	1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6