NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6144 MB
- Around 33% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7438 vs 5572
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 551 vs 487
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12627 vs 10201
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 16828
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 16828
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 23 April 2019 |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1536 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6144 MB |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 vs 5572 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 vs 487 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 vs 10201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 16828 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 16828 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1590 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- 6.9x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15109 vs 3715
- 4.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15109 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3356
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15109 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15109 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop)
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 5572 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | 487 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 | 10201 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 16828 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 16828 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 15109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 15109 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 8054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 8054 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | N18E-G0 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 23 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 171 | 117 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1590 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6144 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 12000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |