NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 11% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 2304
- Around 5% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12627 vs 12354
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19529 vs 18604
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19529 vs 18604
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 2304 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 vs 12354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 vs 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 vs 18604 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 601 vs 551
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3715
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3356
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7449 vs 7438 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 vs 551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 7449 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | 601 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 | 12354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 18604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 8898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 8029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 8029 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104 | TU106 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 171 | 128 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
| Price now | $489.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13600 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 64
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile
