NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
  • Around 95% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 215 Watt
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 20 September 2018
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 215 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

  • Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1110 MHz
  • Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1560 MHz
  • Around 15% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2560
  • 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
  • Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10973 vs 7438
  • Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 551
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18818 vs 12627
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 19529
  • Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 19529
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3715
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3715
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3356
  • Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3356
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1515 MHz vs 1110 MHz
Boost clock speed 1710 MHz vs 1560 MHz
Pipelines 2944 vs 2560
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 10973 vs 7438
PassMark - G2D Mark 912 vs 551
PassMark - G3D Mark 18818 vs 12627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 25500 vs 19529
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 25500 vs 19529
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 6966 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 6966 vs 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 6293 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 6293 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
7438
10973
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
551
912
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12627
18818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19529
25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19529
25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
6966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
6966
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
6293
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
6293
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7438 10973
PassMark - G2D Mark 551 912
PassMark - G3D Mark 12627 18818
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19529 25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19529 25500
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 6966
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 6966
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 6293
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 6293
Geekbench - OpenCL 102127
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 326.494
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3938.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 31.684
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 159.275
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1506.874

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104 TU104
Launch date 27 May 2019 20 September 2018
Place in performance rating 173 98
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $699
Price now $749.99
Value for money (0-100) 32.34

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1560 MHz 1710 MHz
Core clock speed 1110 MHz 1515 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560 2944
Pixel fill rate 99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 249.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 215 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 13,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR6