NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 95% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 215 Watt
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 215 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1110 MHz
- Around 10% higher boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Around 15% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2560
- 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
- Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10973 vs 7438
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 vs 551
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18818 vs 12627
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 vs 19529
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 vs 19529
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 vs 3715
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 vs 3715
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 vs 3356
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 vs 3356
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1110 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Pipelines | 2944 vs 2560 |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10973 vs 7438 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 vs 551 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18818 vs 12627 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 vs 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 vs 19529 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7438 | 10973 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 551 | 912 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12627 | 18818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19529 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19529 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 6293 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102127 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 173 | 98 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $749.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1110 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2944 |
Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 249.6 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |