NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1110 MHz vs 1005 MHz
  • Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3652
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3290
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3290
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1110 MHz vs 1005 MHz
Boost clock speed 1560 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 vs 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 vs 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 vs 3290

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

  • 8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
  • Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 551
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 12627
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 19529
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 19529
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective)
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 869 vs 551
PassMark - G3D Mark 19370 vs 12627
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 21578 vs 19529
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 21578 vs 19529

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
551
869
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12627
19370
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19529
21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19529
21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3715
3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3356
3290
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7438 0
PassMark - G2D Mark 551 869
PassMark - G3D Mark 12627 19370
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19529 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19529 21578
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715 3652
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3356 3290
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3356 3290
Geekbench - OpenCL 137262
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 401.574
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 6432.348
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 43.914
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 215.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 2101.927

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104 TU102
Launch date 27 May 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 171 103
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $9,999

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1560 MHz 1200 MHz
Core clock speed 1110 MHz 1005 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 249.6 GFLOPS (1:32)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 15.97 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines 2560
Pixel fill rate 99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 249.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 18,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 2x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory clock speed 1750 MHz (14000 MHz effective) 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6