NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs AMD Radeon VII
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and AMD Radeon VII videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- 514.8x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 432.24 GT/s
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 282.628 vs 206.353
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.719 vs 21.606
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.919 vs 69.256
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1010.818 vs 499.927
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 11724
- Around 72% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 11724
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 432.24 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 vs 206.353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 vs 21.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 vs 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 vs 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 11724 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon VII
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher core clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1750 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 89406 vs 85548
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4659.199 vs 3403.106
- Around 18% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9292 vs 7856
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2019 vs 13 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1750 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 2304 |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 89406 vs 85548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4659.199 vs 3403.106 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9292 vs 7856 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon VII
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon VII |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85548 | 89406 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 282.628 | 206.353 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3403.106 | 4659.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.719 | 21.606 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.919 | 69.256 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1010.818 | 499.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 11724 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7856 | 9292 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16690 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 786 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | AMD Radeon VII | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.1 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 20 |
GCN generation | Quadro RTX | 5th Gen |
Launch date | 13 November 2018 | 7 February 2019 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $699 |
Place in performance rating | 195 | 214 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon 2nd generation Vega | |
Price now | $699.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 32.74 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | 3.46 TFLOPs |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | 27.7 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | 13.8 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 2304 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | 115.26 GP/s |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s | 432.24 GT/s |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 13,230 million |
Compute units | 60 | |
Stream Processors | 3840 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | 305 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 W | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 1024 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 4096 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 2000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready | ||
ZeroCore |