NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • 675x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13660 vs 12960
  • Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83103 vs 64683
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 13848
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3680
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3336
  • Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 13848
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3680
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3336
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 10 July 2017
Texture fill rate 259.2 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 13660 vs 12960
Geekbench - OpenCL 83103 vs 64683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19377 vs 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 vs 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19377 vs 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 vs 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

  • 2x more core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1350 MHz
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
  • Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 584
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1500 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Pipelines 4096 vs 3072
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 746 vs 584

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13660
12960
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
584
746
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
83103
64683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19377
13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19377
13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3336
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark 13660 12960
PassMark - G2D Mark 584 746
Geekbench - OpenCL 83103 64683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19377 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19377 13848
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3680
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7879
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 174.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3924.968
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 17.305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 175.219
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1226.861

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 10 July 2017
Place in performance rating 171 197
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $1,599

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1350 MHz 1500 MHz
Core clock speed 600 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 259.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 16.59 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.294 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 4096
Pixel fill rate 86.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 259.2 GTexel/s 384.0 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 12,500 million
Floating-point performance 12,288 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 6x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
DirectX 12.0 (12_1)

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 483.8 GB / s
Memory bus width 2048 Bit
Memory clock speed 1890 MHz
Memory type HBM2