NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 675x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13660 vs 12960
- Around 28% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83103 vs 64683
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3336
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 13848
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3680
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3336
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 10 July 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 384.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13660 vs 12960 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83103 vs 64683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- 2x more core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 746 vs 584
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 vs 3072 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 746 vs 584 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13660 | 12960 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 746 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83103 | 64683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 174.714 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Vega 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 171 | 197 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 230 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 12,500 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,288 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 483.8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 2048 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1890 MHz | |
Memory type | HBM2 |