NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- 1043.5x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 66229
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 11536
- Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 11536
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 180 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 vs 66229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 11536 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14498 vs 13640
- Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 584
- Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8500 vs 7879
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 July 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1465 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1725 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14498 vs 13640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 vs 584 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8500 vs 7879 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 14498 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 889 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 66229 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3366 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 8500 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 209.509 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3686.851 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.941 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1036.448 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Code name | TU104 | Navi 10 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 169 | 177 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1465 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | 15.9 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | 7.95 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 110.4 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 248.4 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 180 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 10.3 B |
Compute units | 36 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Width | IGP | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |