NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 5700

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 5700 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

  • 1043.5x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 180 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 66229
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 11536
  • Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 11536
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 259.2 GTexel/s vs 248.4 GT/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 180 Watt
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 83044 vs 66229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19377 vs 11536
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19377 vs 11536

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • 2.4x more core clock speed: 1465 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1725 MHz vs 1350 MHz
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14498 vs 13640
  • Around 52% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 889 vs 584
  • Around 8% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8500 vs 7879
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 July 2019 vs 27 May 2019
Core clock speed 1465 MHz vs 600 MHz
Boost clock speed 1725 MHz vs 1350 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14498 vs 13640
PassMark - G2D Mark 889 vs 584
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3723 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3366 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3723 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3366 vs 3357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 8500 vs 7879

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13640
14498
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
584
889
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
83044
66229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19377
11536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19377
11536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
3723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
3366
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
7879
8500
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q AMD Radeon RX 5700
PassMark - G3D Mark 13640 14498
PassMark - G2D Mark 584 889
Geekbench - OpenCL 83044 66229
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19377 11536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 3723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 3366
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19377 11536
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 3723
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 3366
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7879 8500
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 209.509
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3686.851
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 21.941
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 250
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1036.448

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q AMD Radeon RX 5700

Essentials

Architecture Turing RDNA
Code name TU104 Navi 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 7 July 2019
Place in performance rating 169 177
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $350

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1350 MHz 1725 MHz
Core clock speed 600 MHz 1465 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 259.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 16.59 TFLOPS 15.9 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.294 TFLOPS 7.95 TFLOPs
Pipelines 3072
Pixel fill rate 86.40 GPixel/s 110.4 GP/s
Texture fill rate 259.2 GTexel/s 248.4 GT/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 180 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 10.3 B
Compute units 36
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 2304
Texture Units 144

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs
DisplayPort support
HDMI

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin
Width IGP
Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt

API support

OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
DirectX 12

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory type GDDR6

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
TrueAudio
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready