NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 731.4x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 45% higher maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 11 GB
- Around 33% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 62351
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 15019
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 15019
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 10 March 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 354.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 11 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 vs 62351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3716 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 3072
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18558 vs 13640
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 937 vs 584
- Around 25% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9870 vs 7879
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 3072 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18558 vs 13640 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 vs 584 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9870 vs 7879 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 18558 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 937 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 62351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 15019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 9870 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP102 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 10 March 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 169 | 201 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | |
Price now | $826.98 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1481 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 354.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 11 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 352 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5X | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |