NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
  • Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1185 MHz
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
  • Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
  • Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13660 vs 11774
  • Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 584 vs 485
  • Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83103 vs 78907
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 17328
  • Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 17328
  • Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 vs 6838
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 29 January 2019
Boost clock speed 1350 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Pipelines 3072 vs 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 13660 vs 11774
PassMark - G2D Mark 584 vs 485
Geekbench - OpenCL 83103 vs 78907
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19377 vs 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19377 vs 17328
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7879 vs 6838

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

  • Around 48% higher core clock speed: 885 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3717
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3357
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3717
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3357
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 885 MHz vs 600 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8912 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8055 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8912 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8055 vs 3357

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13660
11774
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
584
485
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
83103
78907
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19377
17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
8055
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19377
17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3357
8055
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
7879
6838
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark 13660 11774
PassMark - G2D Mark 584 485
Geekbench - OpenCL 83103 78907
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19377 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3357 8055
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19377 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3357 8055
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7879 6838
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 168.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1935.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 22.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 111.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1001.496

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU104 TU106
Launch date 27 May 2019 29 January 2019
Place in performance rating 171 179
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1350 MHz 1185 MHz
Core clock speed 600 MHz 885 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 259.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 16.59 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 8.294 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 2304
Pixel fill rate 86.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 259.2 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 80 Watt 115 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 10,800 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Width IGP

API support

OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan
DirectX 12.0

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6