NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2304
- Around 44% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13660 vs 11774
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 584 vs 485
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83103 vs 78907
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 17328
- Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 17328
- Around 15% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 vs 6838
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 29 January 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2304 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13660 vs 11774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 vs 485 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83103 vs 78907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 17328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 vs 6838 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 885 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3357
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3357
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 885 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13660 | 11774 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 485 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83103 | 78907 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 8055 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8912 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 8055 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 6838 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU106 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 29 January 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 171 | 179 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1185 MHz |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 885 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 115 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR6 |