NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 250 Watt
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 20 September 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 1350 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 21790 vs 13660
- Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 vs 584
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138643 vs 83103
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 vs 19377
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 vs 19377
- Around 86% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14629 vs 7879
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1350 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 21790 vs 13660 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 vs 584 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138643 vs 83103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 vs 19377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 vs 19377 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14629 vs 7879 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13660 | 21790 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83103 | 138643 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 14629 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU104 | TU102 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 171 | 87 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $999 | |
Price now | $1,279.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 3072 | |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 8-pin |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz |