NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 259.2 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 3072 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13640 vs 9322
- 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 83044 vs 31445
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19377 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 1676
- Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19377 vs 11437
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 1676
- 2.3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7879 vs 3404
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 vs 9322 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 vs 31445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 vs 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 vs 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 1676 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 vs 3404 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2200
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1350 MHz
- Around 7% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 80 Watt
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 921 vs 584
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1350 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 921 vs 584 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13640 | 9322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 584 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 83044 | 31445 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19377 | 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 1676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19377 | 11437 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 1676 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7879 | 3404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 121.124 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1958.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.452 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 510.941 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P2200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP106 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 10 June 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 169 | 304 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | 1493 MHz |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 259.2 GFLOPS | 119.4 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.59 TFLOPS | 59.72 GFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.294 TFLOPS | 3.822 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3072 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 86.40 GPixel/s | 59.72 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 259.2 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 13600 million | 4400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Width | IGP | |
Length | 201 mm (7.9") | |
API support |
||
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
DirectX | 12.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 200.2 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5X |